![]() ![]() ![]() This minimized the influence of pre-caching before hitting the Start button on each. I did my best for you readers, and ultimately it came down to the copying programs themselves. ![]() The default Windows 7 copier proved to be pretty snappy. Copying a single 4.4 GB file from A to B took only 3:13 and copying from B to C took 2:42. Windows 7 seems to prove itself with large files. When copying 24 GB of my music collection, the process took 18:21 from A to B, and 18:09 from B to C. The one thing that seemed pretty consistent was that as the transfer pushed forward, the rate of transfer would drop over time, ending at about 2/3 of what it initially was at. In numbers, this was roughly 26 MB/s down to about 17 MB/s. Testing TeraCopy yielded some interesting results. Copying the 4.4 GB file took longer than Windows did, at 3:41 from A to B and 2:53 from B to C. While copying 24 GB of smaller files, however, TeraCopy undercut Windows with 17:32 from A to B and 17:02 from B to C. The transfer speeds fluctuated quite a bit compared to Windows 7’s copying mechanism. The rate would drop sharply at times to half, then shoot up for a brief time only to even out a bit. It was like a roller coaster, going anywhere from as high as 31 MB/s down to 12 MB/s. While using SuperCopier, I immediately noticed the sustained transfer speeds. It never dipped too low, even towards the end of the longer copying process, and stayed between 22 MB/s and 18 MB/s. Copying 4.4 GB from A to B took 3:21, beating out TeraCopy for second-place. However, copying from B to C took 4:01, significantly longer than either TeraCopy or Windows.Ģ4 Gb of smaller files took the longest, at about 19:20 from A to B and 18:53 from B to C. I did like the steady transfer speeds, though, so this might be noteworthy if you’re paranoid about backups. It seems that copying large individual files works best using Windows 7’s copying ability, at least if speed is what counts. On the other hand, when copying a large amount of smaller files, TeraCopy seems to have the edge. Our test wasn’t anywhere near scientific, but we did our best to make sure we could rule out interference while still trying to emulate some real-world use. Your mileage may vary, of course, as there are quite a few variables at play here. The numbers were all over the place, so lets take a look at why they might be the way they are.įirst and foremost, since we are using mechanical drives and not solid-state storage, seek times and the like come into effect. #Fastcopy vs teracopy vs ultracopier full#Ĭopying a single large file can be a simple matter or a complicated one, depending on whether the file is in contiguous area or split up and written in the gaps on a fairly full drive. The same thing applies when considering multiple-file operations. Essentially, you can consider single large files and multiple smaller files to be two separate types of copy operations depending on your hardware.Īnother thing to look at is the fact that TeraCopy has an arguable advantage over SuperCopier in that it has 64-bit support. #Fastcopy vs teracopy vs ultracopier update#īoth programs are also a little out of date - TeraCopy hasn’t had an update in a year, and SuperCopier’s last version was in 2009. TeraCopy has a nice list of features, which we’ve covered before. You do have to pay for a license to be able to remove individual files from your copy queue, selecting files with the same extension, and using favorite folders. #Fastcopy vs teracopy vs ultracopier license# On the other hand, SuperCopier is free and offers more features, like file prioritization and custom responses for overwriting or skipping files. #Fastcopy vs teracopy vs ultracopier free# It also has pretty good sustained speeds from our tests, which I suspect will go a long way when copying a large number of large files. It may seem crazy if you’re coming from XP/Vista, but our tests showed that Windows 7 is more than capable of handling large files on its own. #Fastcopy vs teracopy vs ultracopier windows 7# #Fastcopy vs teracopy vs ultracopier free#.#Fastcopy vs teracopy vs ultracopier windows 7#. ![]() #Fastcopy vs teracopy vs ultracopier license#.#Fastcopy vs teracopy vs ultracopier full#.#Fastcopy vs teracopy vs ultracopier update#. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |